Algoright AI vs Unhook
These two tools are often mentioned together, but they work on different things. Unhook removes parts of the YouTube interface. Algoright decides which individual videos reach you. Which is right depends on which problem you actually have.
A note on fairness
Unhook is a well-made, widely used tool with a clear purpose, and for a lot of people it is genuinely the better choice — including some people who would otherwise pay us. This page describes what each tool does rather than arguing that one wins. Details about Unhook reflect its documented, publicly described behaviour; check its own listing for the current feature set before deciding.
What Unhook does
Unhook is a YouTube-focused extension that hides interface elements. You get a list of toggles — hide the home feed, hide the sidebar, hide Shorts, hide comments, hide end-screen suggestions, and so on — and each one removes that surface from the page.
Its strengths are real ones: it is free, it is simple, it is fast, it does not need an account, and because it works by hiding page elements rather than by evaluating content, it is entirely predictable. A hidden sidebar is hidden every time. Nothing is being judged, so nothing can be judged wrongly.
What Algoright does differently
Algoright works at the level of the individual video. It reads the title and channel name of each item, sorts it into one of 35 categories, and hides the categories you switched off. The home feed can stay visible — just without the parts you did not want.
That is the core distinction. Unhook answers “should this surface exist?” Algoright answers “should this video reach me?”
Side by side
| Unhook | Algoright AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Works on | YouTube | YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, X |
| Approach | Hides interface surfaces | Filters individual videos by category |
| Home feed | Hidden entirely, or left alone | Kept, minus the categories you removed |
| Predictability | Total — no judgement involved | Very good, but classification can be wrong |
| Hide Shorts / sidebar / comments | Yes | Yes |
| Category correction | Not applicable — nothing is categorised | Correct a wrong call from the extension; it feeds back into the classifier |
| Deep Work Mode | No | Lock the feed to a single category (Pro) |
| Focus sessions & Focus Score | No | Timed sessions, plus a score from which protections are on |
| Screentime limits | No | Daily limits with alerts (Pro) |
| Learning Plan | No | Turns a goal into a day-by-day plan of YouTube videos (Pro) |
| Stats & weekly digest | No | Dashboard, streaks and a weekly email summary |
| Sync across devices | No | Yes (Pro) |
| Price | Free | Free on YouTube; $4.99/mo Pro for other platforms |
| Account required | No | No for YouTube; yes for Pro |
A fair reading of that table: most of the rows where Algoright has something and Unhook does not are scope differences, not shortcomings. Unhook is not trying to be a dashboard, a coach or a subscription — it is a focused tool that hides parts of YouTube, and it does that well and for free. If none of the extra rows describe something you actually want, they are not advantages; they are just more product than you need.
Who should use Unhook
- You only care about YouTube.
- You want the feed gone, not curated. If your honest answer is “I should not be seeing a home feed at all”, hiding it outright is simpler and more reliable than filtering it.
- You want zero chance of a wrong call. Nothing is being classified, so nothing can be misclassified.
- You want free, with no account, permanently.
Who might prefer Algoright
- You want to keep a feed, minus specific things — keep the cooking and coding videos, drop the gossip and clickbait.
- Your problem is not only YouTube. TikTok, Instagram or X are where the time actually goes.
- You want the distinction made per video rather than per surface.
- You want to lock the feed to one topic while working — that is Deep Work Mode.
- You want YouTube pointed at something specific. The Learning Plan turns a goal — programming, public speaking, personal finance and others — into a day-by-day sequence of videos, which is close to the opposite of what a blocker does.
- You want the surrounding numbers: streaks, a Focus Score, screentime limits and a weekly email summary.
There is nothing stopping you running both. They operate at different levels and do not conflict in any inherent way.
The honest trade-off
Filtering by category buys nuance and pays for it with certainty. Hiding an element is deterministic; deciding what a video is about from its title is not, and Algoright will occasionally get one wrong. You can correct it from the extension, but if that prospect bothers you more than seeing an unwanted feed does, Unhook is the better fit and we would rather you knew that now.
Try the free YouTube filter
Free forever, no account. The fastest way to tell whether per-video filtering suits you better than hiding the feed.